SARS-CoV-2 Mimics Inflammatory Proteins In Our Body

Interleukin-17 is a family of proteins that are produced by T-helper immune cells. They are one of the principal molecules tasked with triggering the inflammatory response in the body. When interleukin-17 proteins interact with their corresponding interleukin-17 receptors on the cell membrane, a cascade of reactions is induced within the cell. This cascade of reactions leads to the activation of the transcription factor NFkB. NFkB induces several cell defenses, including inflammation.

Clinical data has shown that patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 display high levels of inflammation, leading to acute respiratory distress syndrome and multiple organ failure. While antibodies that target interleukin-6 are commonly used to inhibit inflammation, they did not seem to have the same effect in SARS-CoV-2 patients.

The question that remained was how does SARS-CoV-2 cause inflammation and what treatments could be used to diminish inflammation?

Lin et al. hypothesized that inflammation in SARS-CoV-2 patients may be due to interleukin-17 rather than interleukin-6. To test their hypothesis, the researchers examined three different SARS-CoV-2 proteins: NSP2, ORF7a, and ORF8, and tested their interactions with interleukin-17 receptors. To their surprise, only ORF8 exhibited interactions with the interleukin-17 receptors. These results were confirmed by in vitro experimentation and are in line with clinical data. Patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 containing mutated ORF8 proteins displayed lower levels of inflammation.

While this determined that ORF8 interacted with the interleukin-17 receptors, it was unclear whether ORF8 directly triggered inflammation or if it promoted inflammation by increasing the expression of interleukin-17. To test this, Lin et al. engineered cells that did not contain any interleukin-17. They then exposed the cells to ORF8. Researchers found that the inflammatory pathway was triggered even in the absence of interleukin-17. This suggested that ORF8 could mimic interleukin-17 and interact with its receptors to directly induce an inflammatory response.

Lin et al. successfully demonstrated that the interactions between ORF8 and interleukin-17 receptors caused inflammation, but how could those interactions be prevented? The researchers began by testing an interleukin-17 receptor antibody treatment. By using an antibody treatment, researchers believed that the antibodies would block the interleukin-17 receptors so that the ORF8 protein could not bind to the receptors.

To test this theory, Lin et al. engineered a pseudovirus that expressed the ORF8 protein. They then genetically modified mice so that the mice would no longer contain interleukin-17. Lin et al. infected interleukin-17 deficient mice with the pseudovirus and compared inflammation levels in mice treated with receptor antibodies and mice who were left untreated. While inflammation occurred in both the treated and untreated mice, the treated mice exhibited much lower levels of inflammation than untreated mice. This determined that interleukin-17 antibodies were an effective treatment to reduce SARS-CoV-2-induced inflammation.

In a second, related story, scientists from the Lerner Research Institute found similar results. When analyzing the interactions between ORF8 and interleukin-17 receptors, Wu et al., found that inflammation was a direct result of these interactions.

A puzzling aspect of the ORF8/interleukin-17 receptor interaction, however, is that ORF8 and interleukin-17 are not very structurally similar. So, how effective could ORF8 be at actually mimicking the effects of interleukin-17?

Wu et al. isolated blood cells containing interleukin-17 receptors and treated each sample with either ORF8 or interleukin-17 proteins. After these treatments, researchers analyzed the RNA of each blood cell sample to determine how gene expression differed between the samples. These results would indicate how well ORF8 could mimic the effects of interleukin-17 inside the cell.

Interestingly, they found that among the upregulated genes, 81.7% of genes were shared between the two sample groups. Among the downregulated genes, 64% of genes were similar between the two groups. These results confirmed that while ORF8 mimics interleukin-17 to a high degree by initiating similar inflammatory pathways, there are still some distinctions between the pathways they activate through the interleukin-17 receptors.

To further investigate the relationship between ORF8 and the interleukin-17 receptors, Wu et al. examined the interactions between three common ORF8 variants and the interleukin-17 receptors. Through these experiments, researchers found that variants of ORF8 displayed decreased ability to bind to interleukin-17 receptors. Considering that ORF8 is one of the most frequently mutated proteins of SARS-CoV-2, these interactions may provide an explanation for why some variants are more or less likely to cause severe SARS-CoV-2 symptoms.

Both of these studies represent real progress in understanding the inflammation that occurs in patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 and reveals potential treatments against inflammation that could significantly reduce the danger of SARS-CoV-2 infection. It is still a mystery as to why coronaviruses developed a protein that could induce an inflammatory reaction. However, these papers reveal that protein mimics of interleukin-17 and their ability to bind to interleukin-17 receptors may be the key to why some variants of SARS-CoV-2 are more deadly than others.